Anonymous

Why Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned?

12

12 Answers

Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
It is better to sacrifice one small rat for millions of human lives, because we can find cures for illnesses. Would you rather do an experiment on a rat than having a cure to save someone you love, or everyone else? Because of animal testing, we have found cures for all sorts of illnesses. Because of animal testing, we have saved millions of lives!
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
I think it goes both was because there r some stuff that should not be tested on animals
for instance make-up or hair product ect....these r some stuff that doesn need testing on.
If its for meds. Or any others in that categories then yes there should be animal testing.
Andrea Menier Profile
Andrea Menier answered
NO!  Animals are hurt, tortured and live in confinement for no reason what so ever.  There are other, much more productive ways to test drugs, etc. For effectiveness or allergies.  Did you know....penicillin was discovered without animal testing...IF animal testing was done at the time that penicillin was discovered it NEVER would have been approved because it is DEADLY to some animals, even though it cures and helps humans.  Perfect example of why animal testing is inhumane, unnecessary, and downright ridiculous.  Poor animals have feelings, emotions, and feel pain, too!!!  I have done my research on this...this is not propaganda!
thanked the writer.
Anonymous
Anonymous commented
i think it is wrong for mediocre things like makeup and allergic reactions but for HIV/AIDS if the animal already has SIV(Simian Immunodificiency virus) which is very similar to HIV then they already have the sickness and can be tested on without being injected, also there are extremely strict laws to cause animals the minimum pain and distress levels or it is illegal technically
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
Animal testing is good because if we did it on humans then the whole race would be wiped out
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
It is wrong to put other lives into testing for our benefits...however, without testing on living things the results may not be accurate. And at the end we might not have a cure or treatment for our love ones. It cannot not be banned, but sure it should be controlled. All the sick animals, such as lab monkeys, should be taken care of after the experiments. They should not neglected and left to die mercilessly.
SIVAH. ADHARSH. Profile
SIVAH. ADHARSH. answered
No
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
Testing on animals helped develope  vaccines for many life threatening illnbesses. These illnesses include herpes simplex, hepatitis b, polio, rabies, malaria, mumps, and viruses releated to organ transplantation rejection.
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
It doesnt matter whether they are testing the animals on hair products and make up. Its all the same. It is all giving harm to the animals, but on the other hand saving millions of lives. I have this topic for a debate. I am saying it should not be banned
Vincent Davis Profile
Vincent Davis answered
Animal testing of lab animals usually mice is not good or bad but necessary to ensure that medicines are both safe for human consumption and effective as medicines.

I would also add that lab animals are not pets, lab animals are used in the end for strictly scientific purposes.
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
Short answer: Yes.

long answer:

yes, but its effectiveness is questionable. Some groups of chemicals that are highly toxic to humans have no effects on some animals, for example, humans die quickly when exposed to cyanide, but cyanide has absolutely no observable effect on owls.

another hangup is that sometimes animals that are closely related to humans have different effects from some chemicals than humans, for example, monosodium glutamate testing on apes has shown different side effects on the apes than humans experience while the same tests conducted on rodents- mice, rats, etc- have shown nearly identical symptons to the ones humans experience.

even with these hangups, it is much more effective to test a product, especially a chemical or medical product, on animals than it is to test on humans. If it's something that has a good purpose besides simply money or something frivolous like fashion, I think animal testing is the right way to go to keep the products safe for people while at the same time allowing the economics of producing the product and testing it not destroy the company who's doing so.

so.. Yes, for some applications, animal testing is necessary. But for things like fashion, where they make dogs wear eye liner and so on... No, it's not necessary, it's not right, it's not excusable, it's messed up, etc.
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered
Yes it is because if we didnt  most of us would die cause they use animal testing mainly for seeing what happens when they give them medicine     
the medicine that you take everyday or you buy is tested on animals and we eat animals so y would it be such a big deal

Answer Question

Anonymous